It is amazing just how much theological language is used in the risk and safety industry, without much understanding or awareness of what is being stated. A classic is Dekker’s book on suffering loaded with over 30 references to biblical theology. This book opens with Dekker apologising for even using the word ‘faith’.

Then we have the whole ‘safety saves’ discourse and language about safety ‘heaven’ (https://safetyrisk.net/heaven-n-hell-and-the-safety-religion/). Coupled to this is the extensive metaphysical language about zero (https://safetyrisk.net/the-metaphysics-of-safety/). We also have safety not differently sources talking about atonement (https://safetyrisk.net/the-theology-of-blame-from-safety-science/) and spiritual resilience and, HOP talking about spirituality (https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7204134654294048769/) at the same time enjoying the language of ‘dumb’ because blame fixes nothing? Yet, none of these sources have any expertise in theology, that’s the safety way. If you want to know about theology, culture or ethics, ask a safety engineer.

None of this discourse helps safety (https://safetyrisk.net/the-language-of-saving-lives-doesnt-help-safety/). Indeed, the more Safety enters into myths of salvation and spiritual discourse, the more it contradicts its own logic about science. And there is still no articulated stance on ethics nor articulation of a worldview. Yet, the very foundation of safety rests on ‘faith’ in others but we never talk about it.

Coupled to all this language are behaviourist and engineering approaches to risk that use language of certainty, science and culture.

All of this demonstrates an industry divided in itself. And despite all the spin about ‘new view’, there are no methods to help escape from this malaise.

Even a basic understanding and sensitivity towards language could help address this schism. Similarly, a basic sense of theology would help sensitize the industry to its own contradictory discourse.

If you want to learn a little about Theology and be sensitized to its discourse then we have a workshop you may enjoy (https://cllr.com.au/product/theology-and-risk-unit-18/). The workshop will conduct 5 zoom sessions and will focus on an understanding of fallibility (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/fallibility-risk-living-uncertainty/), suffering, harm and hermeneutics. The 5 session course will cost $250. The course will commence in the second week in November on a day and time negotiated by the group.

The course is designed for novice learners who are interested in critical thinking about risk.

You can register here: admin@spor.com.au

BTW, theological thinking has nothing to do with the Bible but everything to do with metaphysical discourse. Such a study would also help one realise that the ethic of the safety industry is about Natural Law and Kant. Again, very theological notions of moral philosophy.

Of course, any study in fallibility will complete smash the nonsense ideology of zero.